The Definition of God

A Comparative Abrahamic Study

1 — The Definition of God in the Torah

This study approaches the Torah as the foundational source in the formation of the Abrahamic conception of God within the religious and historical structure of the Hebrew tradition.

Accordingly, the research is based on the principle of scholarly integrity in presenting the texts as they appear, without selective omission, reconstruction, or the imposition of later theological assumptions upon the original material.

The purpose of this section is not to construct a new image of God, nor to issue doctrinal judgments, but rather to trace the image presented by the Torah itself and to examine its internal structure, including both its stable theological foundations and the tensions that emerge within the textual portrayal.

This section begins by establishing the Ten Commandments as one of the central foundational texts for understanding the relationship between God and humanity within the Torah.

The commandments are not presented merely as legal instructions, but as a declaration of divine identity itself. The text begins with God identifying Himself as the one who brought the Israelites out of bondage, thereby connecting worship, covenant, obedience, morality, and law to the divine nature. In this sense, the Ten Commandments function as a primary theological framework for understanding the conception of God within the Torah.

Through a comprehensive reading of the Torah from beginning to end, God is presented as the one and unique deity without rival or partner, the creator of the heavens, the earth, humanity, and life itself.

The Torah portrays God as the origin of existence and the supreme authority over creation, nature, and history. Creation is linked directly to divine action, and the power of God is manifested through the formation, ordering, sustaining, and governing of the world.

The Torah further presents God as eternal, associated with the patriarchs and covenants, and continuous throughout generations. God appears not as a distant abstraction separated from history, but as an active and intervening presence within human events. The divine role is expressed through revelation, prophecy, legislation, judgment, salvation, covenant, and historical intervention.

Within the Torah, God is described as:

The Torah also presents God as the source of law and legislation. Divine commandments regulate not only ritual worship, but also moral and social life, including prohibitions against murder, injustice, adultery, falsehood, and oppression. As a result, the image of God within the Torah becomes deeply connected to ethical order and social justice alongside holiness and worship.

The texts further emphasize divine knowledge of human actions and intentions, as well as God’s continuous involvement in human affairs through revelation, prophetic speech, commandments, punishments, deliverance, and historical events. God is portrayed as the speaking deity who reveals His will to prophets, places words into the mouths of messengers, and guides the religious community through direct revelation or mediated communication.

The image of God in the Torah is also deeply connected to the concept of holiness. Divine presence appears in specific sacred settings such as Mount Sinai, the Tabernacle, the pillar of cloud and fire, and the Ark of the Covenant. Holiness is associated with fear, reverence, ritual purity, and strict boundaries governing worship and approach to the sacred. Approaching the holy sometimes appears as a dangerous act requiring precise conditions and limitations. This theme will be examined in greater detail in a later independent section due to the central role holiness plays in shaping the relationship between God and humanity within the Torah.

Within the framework of the divine-human relationship, the Torah presents God as the Lord of covenantal relationships, particularly with Noah, Abraham, and the Israelites. The covenant functions as a religious, moral, and legislative bond grounded in worship, obedience, commitment, promise, blessing, protection, and punishment simultaneously.

God also appears as the Deliverer and Savior, especially in the Exodus narrative, where divine identity is tied not merely to abstract theology but to historical action, liberation, and salvation. In addition, God is portrayed as the ruler of history and the director of nations and peoples, raising kingdoms and bringing them down according to the unfolding religious narrative.

Alongside these central and relatively stable descriptions, however, the Torah also contains passages that raise interpretive and theological questions concerning the nature of divine description itself. Certain texts employ anthropomorphic or sensory language in relation to God, including descriptions of walking, descending, hands, face, eyes, anger, direct speech, and localized appearances. Such descriptions open important discussions regarding the nature of religious language within the Torah and whether these expressions are intended literally or function as accommodative language intended to communicate divine realities through human perception.

Other passages speak of divine “regret” or describe changes in the course of punishment following prayer or repentance, raising questions concerning divine will, immutability, and narrative representation within the Torah. Tension also appears between texts emphasizing divine transcendence and incomparability and others that describe visible manifestations or experiences associated with the divine presence.

The Torah further contains narratives involving direct dialogue between God and human beings, such as Abraham’s intercession concerning Sodom, Moses’ objections and appeals, and Jacob’s wrestling encounter. These narratives raise broader questions regarding the nature of divine-human interaction and the limits of narrative representation of the divine presence.

An especially significant issue concerns the figure of the “Angel of the Lord,” where some passages present a fluid movement between the speech of the angel and the speech of God Himself. At times the narrative shifts between “the angel” and “the Lord” without a clear distinction, opening important avenues for studying mediation, revelation, and divine representation within ancient religious texts. This may indicate that certain forms of divine speech are presented through a mediating figure who speaks fully in the name of God.

The Torah also includes passages concerning collective punishment, religious warfare, destruction, curses, and divine testing of human beings. These texts require careful historical, linguistic, and theological examination in order to understand their relationship to the broader image of God presented within the Torahic narrative structure.

These passages are not presented here as material for rejecting the text, but rather as integral components of the overall structure through which the Torah constructs its conception of God. Accordingly, the study does not engage in selective citation, but seeks to gather the full textual image as presented, including its central attributes, religious functions, linguistic expressions, and theological tensions.

For this reason, the study of the definition of God in the Torah extends beyond merely collecting divine names and attributes. It also includes analyzing the relationship between divine transcendence and historical presence, holiness and mercy, justice and punishment, revelation and mediation, as well as stability and change within religious expression.

This section will later be accompanied by detailed tables concerning the names and attributes of God as they appear throughout the Torah, including their meanings, contexts, and theological functions within the narrative structure, before moving in later stages of the project toward the study of the definition of God in the Gospel and finally the Qur’an as part of a broader investigation into the conception of God across the Abrahamic traditions.

The Gospel Tradition

The Definition of God in the Gospel

The Gospel traditions continue the Abrahamic understanding of God while presenting theological themes connected to mercy, guidance, revelation, spiritual relationship, judgment, and divine presence. The foundation of divine unity appears clearly in the words attributed to Jesus:

“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.”

This declaration preserves continuity with the earlier biblical understanding of God as the one, supreme divine reality and the source of revelation, authority, creation, and sacred law.

Within the Gospel narrative, God is frequently described through the language of “Fatherhood.” However the concept of divine fatherhood, does not necessarily imply biological generation. Rather, it often functions within a theological and spiritual framework describing God as:

The paternal language reflects relationship, guidance, care, discipline, and spiritual belonging rather than physical descent. This symbolic and theological usage appears throughout the broader biblical tradition where divine fatherhood may refer to covenantal closeness, protection, authority, or spiritual instruction.

The Gospel portrayal of God includes several major themes that align with earlier Abrahamic conceptions of divine reality:

The Gospel traditions also emphasize themes connected to:

At the same time, the Gospel material contains theological expressions and narrative tensions that later became subjects of major doctrinal interpretation and debate concerning the nature of God, divine mediation, sonship language, incarnation, authority, and the relationship between God and Jesus.

These subjects will be examined separately in later sections due to their theological complexity and their central importance within the historical development of Christian doctrine.

Additional themes that will be explored in later sections include:

The Qur’anic Tradition

The Definition of God in the Qur’an

The divine discourse in the Qur’an begins with the affirmation of absolute monotheism, transcendence, sovereignty, mercy, revelation, and direct authority over creation and history. The Qur’an presents God as the one eternal divine reality without partner, rival, origin, or offspring.

The divine name “Allah” appears as the central and supreme name within the Qur’anic revelation, referring to the one God who alone possesses creation, authority, worship, revelation, and judgment. The name is not presented merely as a religious title, but as the most comprehensive expression of ultimate divine reality within the Qur’anic worldview.

The Qur’anic understanding of God is built upon the concept of Tawhid, where God is described as:

The Qur’an repeatedly emphasizes that God:

Within the Qur’anic framework, divine transcendence is combined with direct involvement in history, revelation, guidance, and human accountability. God in the Qur’an is described as:

The Qur’an also places major emphasis upon the divine names and attributes, where these names function not merely as titles, but as theological expressions revealing the relationship between God, creation, revelation, mercy, justice, wisdom, and power.

Among the major divine names and attributes appearing in the Qur’an and prophetic tradition are:

The Qur’anic revelation also strongly rejects:

while maintaining the concepts of revelation, prophecy, and prophetic mediation within the limits of servitude and obedience to God alone.

Additional subjects will be explored in later sections of the project, including:

Comparative Abrahamic Analysis

A comparative reading of the Torah, the Gospel traditions, and the Qur’an reveals both continuity and theological tension within the Abrahamic conception of God. Across the three traditions, the image of the one supreme God remains structurally present, yet the textual presentation of divine identity develops through different historical, theological, and revelatory stages.

Within the Torah, God appears as the one creator, the source of covenant, sacred law, revelation, judgment, and historical intervention. At the same time, the Torah contains a number of textual and theological tensions concerning the nature of divine representation. Certain passages emphasize divine transcendence and uniqueness, while others employ anthropomorphic language, descriptions of divine regret, localized manifestations, mediated appearances, and complex interactions involving the “Angel of the Lord.” These passages later became major subjects of theological interpretation and debate.

The Gospel traditions continue the Abrahamic affirmation of one God, particularly through declarations such as:

“Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.”

However, the Gospel material also introduces additional theological language concerning fatherhood, sonship, mediation, incarnation, and the relationship between God and Christ. As a result, the Gospel tradition preserves the continuity of divine unity while simultaneously generating interpretive tensions concerning the precise nature of divine identity, mediation, and sacred authority within later Christian theology.

The Qur’an enters this Abrahamic theological landscape while presenting itself not merely as continuation, but also as clarification and correction of earlier interpretive developments. The Qur’anic discourse strongly reaffirms absolute divine unity, transcendence, and incomparability while explicitly rejecting:

The Qur’an also directly addresses theological questions that appeared within earlier traditions. While certain Torahic passages speak of divine “regret,” the Qur’anic discourse emphatically rejects imperfection, fatigue, limitation, or change associated with created weakness. The Qur’an declares:

“No fatigue touched Us.”

Likewise, the Qur’an repeatedly denies that God lies, fails, or becomes subject to human limitation, while simultaneously preserving revelation, prophecy, covenant, sacred law, and divine communication.

One of the most striking comparative patterns concerns the continuity of revelation itself. The Torah establishes the foundational prophetic and legislative structure through covenant, sacred law, and communal formation. The Gospel traditions then present Jesus not as abolishing the earlier sacred law, but as continuing within its broader revelatory framework:

“I have not come to abolish the Law.”

Within this progression, the image of God appears fundamentally continuous across revelation despite changing historical circumstances, prophetic missions, and legal applications.

Another significant pattern emerging through comparative reading concerns the relationship between revelation and sacred time. The Torah repeatedly establishes future oriented structures through covenant, prophecy, sacred law, and expectations concerning the continuation of divine guidance and fulfillment. The Gospel traditions likewise preserve a strong future oriented dimension through teachings concerning the kingdom, future judgment, spiritual fulfillment, and continuing revelation.

What appears particularly remarkable within the Qur’anic discourse is that it simultaneously speaks about:

within a single revelatory structure.

The Qur’an repeatedly revisits earlier prophetic histories, reinterprets previous religious narratives, addresses the contemporary environment of revelation, and simultaneously speaks about future judgment, destiny, prophecy, and the continuation of divine guidance. In this sense, the Qur’anic structure presents itself as engaging the entire Abrahamic historical continuum simultaneously.

Accordingly, the comparative Abrahamic structure reveals a progressive theological movement in which:

The later stages of this research will examine these developments through detailed textual, linguistic, theological, and historical analysis concerning divine unity, revelation, mediation, prophetic continuity, sacred law, theological tension, divine attributes, and the evolving structure of Abrahamic religious interpretation.